The Evaluation of Ground Reaction Forces During Two Different Soccer Throw-In Techniques: A Preliminary Study

Ali Onur Cerrah, Deniz Şimşek, Hayri Ertan
3.262 1.208


The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in Ground Reaction Forces (GRF) between standing and running soccer throw-in. Six male amateur soccer players volunteered participated in the current study. All data are expressed as mean±SD. The longer distance was observed in the running throw-in than the standing throw-in. The standing throw-in showed higher values at Vertical (Fz) GRF during back swing, forward swing and release phases. However, that of the running throw-in during follow through phase was higher than that of the standing throw-in. As a result, the longer throwing distance in the running throw-in can be explained that the players spend shorter time in all phases at running throw-in than they did in the standing throw-in. This might causes efficient energy transfer from proximal to distal segment during the running throw-in.


Standing throw-in, Running Throw-in, Kinematic, Force plate

Full Text:



Chang, J. (1979). The biomechanical analysis of the selected soccer throw-in techniques. Asian Journal of Physical Education, 2, 254-60.

Carnys, G. De. and Lees, A. (2007). The effects of strength training and practice on soccer throw-in performance. In T. Reilly and F. Korkusuz (Eds.), Science and Football VI (pp. 16-20). London: Routledge.

Cerrah, A.O., Onarici Gungor, E. and Yılmaz, İ. (2012). Relationship between isokinetic strength parameters and soccer throw-in performance. Isokinetics and Exercise Science (Accepted).

Cerrah, A.O., Onarici Gungor, E., Soylu A.R., Ertan H., Lees A. and Bayrak C. (2011). Muscular activation patterns during the soccer in-step kick. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 19, 181- 190.

Kerwin, D. G. and Bray, K. (2004). Quantifying the trajectory of the long soccer throw-in. In M. Hubbard, R. D. Mehta and J. M. Pallis (Eds.), The Engineering of Sport 5 (Vol. 1) (pp 63– 69). Sheffield: International Sports Engineering Association.

Linthorne, N.P. and Everett, D.J. (2006). Release angle for attaining maximum distance in the soccer throw-in, Sports Bimechanics, 5, 243-260.

Lees, A., Kemp, M. and Moura, F.A. (2005). Biomechanical analysis of the soccer throw-in with a particular focus on the upper limb motion. In T. Reilly, J. Cabri and D. Araujo (Eds.), Science and Football V (pp 89-94). Lisbon: Faculty of Human Kinetics.

Levendusky, T.A., Clinger, C.D., Miller, R.E. and Armstrong, C.W. (1985). Soccer throw-in kinematics, In J. Terauds and J.N. Barham (Eds.), Biomechanics in Sports II (pp 258-268). California: Del Mar.

Messier, S. P. and Brody, M.A. (1986). Mechanics of translation and rotation during conventional and handspring soccer throw-ins. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 2, 301–315.

Kollath, E. and Schwirtz, A. (1988).Biomechanical analysis of the soccer throw-in. In T. Reilly, A. Lees, K. Davidsi and W.J. Murpht (Eds.), Science and Football (pp 460-67). New York: EandFN Spon.